AI Verification Initiative
Wider priorities and questions advancing independent AI verification.
JUST VERIFY THINK TANK
The Just Verify Think Tank is a standing platform for initiative-led, bespoke and collaborative roundtables with organisations, industries, jurisdictions and events, examining AI trust, verification, ethics, governance, agentic AI, organisational control, responsible adoption and responsible reliance.

WHY THE THINK TANK EXISTS
Its agenda can be informed by the AI Verification Initiative, emerging sector and jurisdictional needs, independent Just Verify inquiry and carefully governed collaboration.
Organisations, sectors and jurisdictions face different AI risks, dependencies, evidence requirements and operating conditions. The Think Tank creates a structured environment in which those perspectives can meet, challenge assumptions and examine what responsible reliance should require in practice.
It connects technology, governance, research, infrastructure, policy and real-world adoption while preserving Just Verify’s independent judgement.
A STANDING PLATFORM
The Initiative is an important source of questions, but it is not the Think Tank’s only route. Independent, sector-specific, jurisdictional and collaborative programmes can also inform the agenda.
Wider priorities and questions advancing independent AI verification.
Emerging questions that require focused examination or a new programme.
Distinct operating, policy, market and infrastructure conditions.
Relevant programmes developed with suitable collaborators or sponsors, without transferring editorial control.
CURRENT THINK TANK SERIES
The 2026 AI Verification Think Tank Roundtable Series is one programme within the wider Think Tank. Every city examines Trust, Verification, and Sovereignty & Independence before the perspectives are brought together in one connected synthesis.

CAMBRIDGE

OXFORD

LONDON
EVOLVING AREAS OF INQUIRY
These areas describe current priorities rather than fixed boundaries. Additional themes can be introduced where a programme, sector, jurisdiction or emerging verification need requires them.
What evidence should organisations require before relying on AI?
How should identity, authority, delegation and behaviour be verified?
How can claims, decisions and responsibility remain traceable?
How should performance, failure and changing conditions be assessed?
How can organisations preserve meaningful control over external dependencies?
What should organisations know before they adopt, rely on, scale or delegate to AI?
HOW THE THINK TANK WORKS
The format adapts to the issue being examined, but the purpose remains consistent: bring the right judgement to the right question and translate the inquiry into useful direction.
Clarify the verification issue, organisational decision or evidence gap that needs examination.
Curate the disciplines, sectors and forms of judgement the question requires.
Compare experience, surface tensions and identify what remains unresolved.
Develop findings, research priorities, practical work or continued programmes where justified.
WHO CONTRIBUTES
Participation is based on what somebody can contribute, not simply their sector or job title. The perspective families below are deliberately broad and are not fixed categories.
Leadership, operations, risk, strategy and responsible adoption.
Systems, agents, data, product, innovation and emerging technology.
Legal, investment, assurance, advisory and commercial judgement.
Broader participation wherever it strengthens the inquiry.
Public responsibility, policy, governance and institutional oversight.
Academic, evaluation, certification, testing and evidence perspectives.
Resilience, privacy, physical and digital infrastructure and public interest.
OUTPUTS & CONTINUED WORK
Think Tank activity identifies what matters, what is supported by evidence and what needs to happen next. Roundtable findings may inform further research, Trust Lab projects, practical pilots, organisational solutions and longer-term partnerships.
Capture themes, disagreement, evidence gaps and unresolved questions without manufacturing consensus.
Identify where deeper research, testing, methods or organisational work is required.
Develop further roundtables, research, Trust Lab activity or sector and jurisdiction programmes.
Support practical decisions, verification approaches and collaborative work where appropriate.
PRIVACY, ATTRIBUTION & INDEPENDENCE
Sponsors and collaborators may support a programme, but they do not control the agenda, participant balance, discussion, findings or conclusions.
Sessions may be private or invitation-only to support candid, focused discussion.
General themes may be shared, but individual comments are not attributed without permission.
Participation or support does not create endorsement, certification or control over Just Verify’s conclusions.
WAYS TO ENGAGE
Every request is considered against the relevance of the proposed contribution, the needs of current programmes and the independence of the Think Tank.
Join a roundtable, inquiry programme or focused working discussion where your experience can strengthen the conversation.
Provide financial support for a series or programme while Just Verify retains control of the agenda, participation and outputs.
Work with Just Verify to develop a bespoke roundtable, connected inquiry or collaborative programme around a strategically important AI trust question.
START A CONVERSATION
Share a concise overview and the Just Verify team will consider the most appropriate route.
ADVANCE THE NEXT INQUIRY
The Think Tank creates space for informed judgement and provides a route from discussion into continued work.